Kecemasan anak usia dini dan intervensinya (Studi kasus di TK Majaksingi)

Authors

  • Lilis Madyawati Pendidikan Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang, Indonesia
  • Nurjannah Nurjannah Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/aulad.v4i1.84

Keywords:

kecemasan anak sekolah, bantuan mengatasi, emosi

Abstract

Pendidikan anak usia dini harus terencana, distimulan dan holistik. Kecemasan yang terjadi pada anak tak dapat diabaikan. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi kecemasan yang dialami seorang anak perempuan berusia 5 tahun 6 bulan yang bersekolah di kelompok B TK Majaksingi kecamatan Borobudur. Terdapat upaya yang dilakukan guru, dan pengelola, penyebab siswa senang/ tidak senang, kerja sama sekolah dengan orang tua, serta hasil intervensinya. Pendekatan penelitian menggunakan qualitative research dengan case study. Peneliti melakukan survey pendahuluan, field study, penelusuran literatur, dan beberapa informan. Pengumpulan data melalui indept interview, metode observasi, dan teknik dokumentasi. Analisis data secara deskripsi terinci tentang kasus, pengumpulan kategori, interpretasi langsung,membentuk pola, serta kesepadanan kata. Kecemasan dipacu kesulitan akademik, tuntutan orang tua, riwayat kesehatan buruk. Pihak sekolah memberi intervensi berupa: mengkomunikasikan kepada orang tua, pendampingan, pengulangan, dan pembiasaan, namun belum menunjukkan hasil maksimal

References

Amaludin, dkk. 2018. Character Education Early Childhood: Brain Based Teaching Approach. International journal of Pure and Applied mathematics. Vol. 119 No. 18. p. 1229- 1245.

Ansari, A., Pianta, R.C. 2019. Starting Early: The Benefits of Attending Early Childhood Education Programs at Age 3. American Educational Research Journal. Vol. 56 No. 4. p. 1495- 1523.

Bogdan, Robert, C. dan Biklen, K.S. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Allyn and Bacon, Inc: Boston London.

Burgess, S.,et al. 2014. What Parents Want: School Preferences and School Choice. The Economic Journal. Vol. 125 No. 587. p. 1262- 1289.

Capurso, Michele, et.al. 2020. Empowering Children Through School Re-Entry Activities. Journal Psycho- Educational.

Cowden, P. 2019. Communication and Conflict: Anxiety and Learning. Research ini Higher Education Journal. p. 1- 9.

Creswell, Jhon W. 2016. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Eisen, A; Engler, L. 2006. Helping Your Child Overcome Separation Anxiety or School Refusel. New Harbinger Publications.

Elliot, J.G; & Place, M. 2017. Practitioner Review: School Refusal: Developments in Conceptualisation and Treatment Since 2000. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Vol. 60 No. 1. p. 4- 15.

Epstein, Joyce L. 2010. School, Family, Community Partnership: Caring for the Children We Share. Phi Delta Kappan 76. No.9.

Feist, J; Feist, G; Roberts, T.A. 2017. Teori Kepribadian Buku 1 Edisi 8. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Guba, E.G; Lincoln, Y.S. 1981. Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefullness of Evaluation Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.

Kaplan, H.I; Sdaocj, B.J; Grebb, J.A. 2010. Sinopsis Psikiatri Ilmu Pengetahuan Perilaku Psikiatri Klinis. Tangerang (Indonesia): Binarupa Aksara.

Killu, K; Mach, R; Crundwell, A. 2016. Students with Anxiety in the Classroom: Educational Accomodations and Interventions. Sage journal. Vol. 125 No. 2. p. 30- 40.

Kuusimaki, A.M; Malmivaara, L.U; Tirri, K. 2019. Parents’and Teachers’Views on Digital Communication in Finland. Journal Education Research International. p. 1-7.

Mano, Jastrowski. 2017. School Anxietu in Children and Adolescents with Chronic Pain. Review Article. Hindawi Pain Research and Management. p. 1- 9.

Noor, K.B.M. 2008. Case Stydy: A Strategic Research Methodology. American Journal of Applied Sciences. Vol 5. No.11. p. 1602- 1604.

Olore. 2017. The Effectiveness of General and Special Education Collaboration in Middle Schools. Educational Studie Dissertations. Lesley University.

Panjaitan, H. 2014. Pentingnya Menghargai Orang lain. Humaniora. Vol. 5 No. 1. hal. 88- 96.

Peters, W.J. 2015. The Relationship Between Anxiety. Personality Characteristic, and Working Memory Performance. Thesis.Waston California.

Saddik, Basema, et.al. 2020. Assesing the Influence of Parental Anxiety on Childhood Anxiety. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.1120128371.

Sanchez, et al. 2018. The Effectiveness of School- Based Mental Health Services for Elementary- Aged Children: A Meta- Analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Vol. 57. No. 3. p. 153- 165.

Seidler, A.W, et al. 2017. School- Based Depression and Anxiety Prevention Programs for Young People: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. Vol. 51. p. 30- 47.

Stake, Robert E. 2005. Case Study Methods in Educational Research: Seeking Sweet Water: InR. M. Jaeger (Ed.) Complementary Methods for research in education, 2nd Edition (p. 401- 414). American Educational Research Association: Washington, DC.

Taylor, Steven J & Bogdan, R. 2015. Qualitative Research Methods. 4th Edition. Wiley.

University of California San Fransisco. 2018. Preventive Health and Savety in the Child care Setting. third Edition.

Waldfogel, J., & Washbrook, E.V. 2010. Law income and early cognitive development in the UK: A report for the Sutton Trust. University of Bristol.

Yin, Rober, K. 2014. Studi Kasus Desain dan Metode. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-14

How to Cite

Madyawati, L., & Nurjannah, N. (2020). Kecemasan anak usia dini dan intervensinya (Studi kasus di TK Majaksingi). Aulad: Journal on Early Childhood, 4(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.31004/aulad.v4i1.84

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)